Canterbury Law Review
- Publisher:
- University of Canterbury School of Law
- Publication date:
- 2023-01-27
- ISBN:
- 0112-0581
Issue Number
Latest documents
- An Evaluation of the No Asset Procedure as a Fresh Start for Insolvent Consumer Debtors in Aotearoa New Zealand
- Exploring the After-MAF: The Past, Present and Future Of 'Male Assaults Female'
- Pluralism in Action: The Role and Future of Pūkenga in Aotearoa New Zealand
- Tikanga in Developing the Common Law of Contract
- AI Revolution in New Zealand's Legal Profession: Exploring Junior Lawyers' Experiences and Cultural Implications
- Bordered Justice: Legal Erasure and the Performance of Accountability in the Montara Commission of Inquiry
- Land of the Long White Lab Coat: Aotearoa New Zealand and the Laws of Trusted Research
As an island nation, New Zealand punches well above its weight internationally in terms of both technological innovation and higher education. Yet at the intersection of both domains, New Zealand has lagged in the protection of sensitive and critical university research – it takes little part in the academic discourse surrounding this concept (which the New Zealand government refers to as "trusted research") and has enacted no new laws in the space since the late 2000s. In doing so, New Zealand risks falling behind its Indo-Pacific neighbours and allies including Australia, the United States and Japan. This paper therefore responds to both shortfalls in research on the subject of trusted research in New Zealand, by providing a legal analysis of the frameworks which protect university research and promoting several law reforms which could uplift the nation's trusted research position. Noting the increasing importance of New Zealand's role in resisting the actions of foreign interference and espionage in the region, this paper argues for a most robust security posture across New Zealand's university landscape
- Of Hobbits, Collective Bargaining, and False Economic Emergencies: Accelerated Legislation and Political Constitutionalism
Many constitutional systems allow for an acceleration of the legislative process. Under New Zealand's mechanism, the so-called urgency motion, the government can introduce and pass a bill within a single parliamentary sitting. New Zealand's constitution is also strongly political, that is, parliamentary actions are mainly controlled by political means (such as general elections) rather than legal means (such as judicial review). This combination is highly concerning when viewed through the lens of securitisation theory. This theory posits that if the public perceives a political issue as an existential threat to a fundamental social value, the use of extraordinary measures is justified, such as accelerating the legislative process. Thus, if the government can influence the public narrative and make a political issue appear to be an existential threat, the use of urgency to pass it will be justified, irrespective of whether the issue really poses an existential threat. In such a case, the political constitutional safeguard of public censure of parliament fails, because the public has already been convinced that extraordinary measures are necessary and justified. The circumstances around passage of the "Hobbit Law" (the Employment Relations (the Film Industry Work) Amendment Act 2010) shows that political constitutions are vulnerable to the constitutional effects of securitisation of non-existentially threatening political issues
- A Feminist Exploration of the Employee/Contractor Boundary: A Call to Action
Everyone who works in Aotearoa New Zealand is entitled to respect, dignity, fair conditions, safety and reasonable reward. While some workers are protected by employment legislation, the reality for workers who fall outside the legal status of "employee" is very different. Generally known as "contractors", these workers face very mixed work experiences. The Courts have considered a steady stream of applications over the past two decades resulting in some contractors being reclassified as "employees", able to pursue remedies for harms suffered. Various governments have known about the growing issue and failed to act. Advocacy groups have had mixed results pursuing improved conditions for those they represent. This research reviews the law on the employee/contractor boundary, along with caselaw, MBIE's Consultation on Better Protection for Contractors and the recommendations of the Tripartite Working Group on Better Protection for Contractors, through a feminist lens. The research will show that there are many voices missing from the discussions that have been had to date and a general lack of understanding of the harms being experienced by some contractors. Active listening and a willingness to consider new ways forward to achieve a mana enhancing good working life for everyone is urgently needed
- Critique of Hart's Concept of Law in Samoa
Hart's "Concept of Law" has gained widespread recognition in legal philosophy by proposing that a legal system is best understood as a combination of primary rules that impose obligations and secondary rules that grant the authority to create, modify, and interpret those primary rules. One aspect in Hart's concept concerns the prelegal or primitive system, consisting of a society governed solely by primary rules of conduct without secondary rules. Thus, it proceeds to assert that such a system exists in a small, stable community bound by shared beliefs and kinship. This article illustrates that upon closer scrutiny within legally intricate and bijural contexts – such as the case of Samoa, where both primary and secondary rules co-exist – the argument proves to be fundamentally flawed. Moreover, this critique highlights the limitations in the standard application of Hart's Concept of Law in other post-colonial contexts, including Aotearoa New Zealand and South Africa. The article further argues that more critical and nuanced perspectives are needed to examine the legal reality of Hart's theory in modern postcolonial contexts
Featured documents
- Building the Foundations of Tikanga Jurisprudence
Recent years have seen a string of cases in which tikanga Māori has been considered or recognised as part of the common law of New Zealand. The courts have asserted – and the Crown has accepted – that it is uncontroversial that tikanga is part of the common law. Yet, a close examination of the...
- A Nation Cast Adrift? A Legal and Historical Analysis of Tikanga Maori for the Purposes of General Common Law Application
Tikanga as a basis for Aotearoa/New Zealand's legal framework and governance is not an entirely new concept. Tikanga received recognition in colonial New Zealand's early days and its subsequent disregard was an unfortunate consequence of an increasingly aggressive settler colonialism. Though great...
- An Evaluation of the No Asset Procedure as a Fresh Start for Insolvent Consumer Debtors in Aotearoa New Zealand
- Exploring the After-MAF: The Past, Present and Future Of 'Male Assaults Female'
- Is There a Need for Greater Regulation of Insolvency Practitioners in New Zealand? Exploring the Options for Reform
- Pluralism in Action: The Role and Future of Pūkenga in Aotearoa New Zealand
- When is a Subsidiary's Negligence the Parent Company's Problem?
Recognising a duty of care on a parent company for the acts or omissions of its subsidiary poses the difficult issue of accommodating principles of limited liability and separate corporate personality within the paradigm of traditional tort principles. These difficulties mean the law is unsettled....
- Trade Secrets' Under New Zealand Law
Under New Zealand civil law there is no specific legislation that governs the protection of "trade secrets". Before the civil courts the protection of secret information is largely addressed by the judge-made breach of confidence action. Yet, the term trade secret is regularly used in commercial...
- The Wrong Tort in the Right Place: Avenues for the Development of Civil Privacy Protections in New Zealand
Privacy law has always developed in a piecemeal fashion as courts and legislators struggle with the inherently difficult concepts that it invokes. In New Zealand three causes of action exist to remedy breaches of an individual's private sphere: the tort of publication of private facts, the tort of...
- Director and Shareholder Liability at Pike River Coal
More than five years on from the tragedy that occurred at Pike River mine, no individual has been held to account for the many failures at the mine that have been exposed subsequently. This article explores the events leading to the tragedy and considers whether directors and shareholders of the...