Almarzooqi v Salih
| Court | High Court |
| Judgment Date | 20 May 2020 |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] NZHC 1049 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Almarzooqi v Salih
...is legally aided, there is no order as to costs. 1 Almarzooqi v Salih [2020] NZHC 2441 [Substantive decision]. 2 Almarzooqi v Salih [2020] NZHC 1049, [2020] NZFLR 251 [Security for costs 3 At [13]. 4 At [29]. 5 At [30]. 6 Von Wyl v Engeler [1998] 3 NZLR 416 (CA) at 420–421 (emphasis added).......
-
Almarzooqi v Salih
...As threshold issues the Court had to be satisfied of three things:4 (a) 2 3 4 the Dubai court had jurisdiction; Almarzooqi v Salih [2020] NZHC 1049, [2020] NZFLR 251 [Security for costs At [13]. At [29]. [12] (b) the Dubai judgment was for a liquidated sum; and (c) the Dubai judgment was fi......
-
Sky Scrapers General Trading Llc v Zoono Limited
...the parties’ cases only where the extent of uncompensatable disadvantage to the parties is found to be 17 As noted in Almarzooqi v Smith [2020] NZHC 1049 at largely equivocal. Even then, reference can only be made to matters in respect of which there is no credible dispute, resolution of ma......
-
Keezz Ltd (nzcn 6836013) v Keezz Pty Ltd (can 116 327 005)
...McFarlane Laboratories (1984) Ltd 1 PRNZ 467 (HC) at 470. Arnold v Fairfax New Zealand Ltd [2017] NZHC 1757. At [10]. Almarzooqi v Salih [2020] NZHC 1049. which may suggest that an order is not appropriate; and some questions apply generally. [Footnotes omitted] [15] These categories and qu......