Alpine Energy Limited v The Human Rights Review Tribunal
| Judgment Date | 11 November 2014 |
| Neutral Citation | [2014] NZHC 2792 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 11 November 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
W v Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal
...it, whether or not it would be admissible in a court of law.” 48 At [50]–[51]. 49 Alpine Energy Ltd v Human Rights Review Tribunal [2014] NZHC 2792. 50 At 51 At [33](a). 52 For instance, the provisions on compellability (ss 71–76), questioning of witnesses (ss 83–101) and alternative ways o......
-
Waters v Alpine Energy Ltd (Discovery No. 2)
...the case back to the Tribunal for the discovery issues to be considered afresh. See Alpine Energy Ltd v Human Rights Review Tribunal [2014] NZHC 2792 at [34]. was because in determining whether a discovery order should be made in respect of the documents for which confidentiality has been c......
-
Boyce v Westpac New Zealand Ltd (Non-Party Discovery)
...power to order discovery of even confidential documents was not questioned in Alpine Energy Ltd v Human Rights Review Tribunal [2014] NZHC 2792 (11 November 2014) and see also the discussion of discovery in the subsequent decision in Hood v American Express International (NZ) Inc (Discovery......
-
Cooper v Hamilton Pharmacy 2011 Ltd (Pre-Trial Admissibility Ruling)
...to be made in context was emphasised, albeit in a slightly different setting, in Alpine Energy Ltd v Human Rights Review Tribunal [2014] NZHC 2792 af [31] where the Tribunal was criticised adjudicating upon admissibility without seeing the documents in question . While the present objection......
Request a trial to view additional results