Attorney General v Prince

JurisdictionNew Zealand
Date1998
CourtUnspecified Court (New Zealand)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
685 cases
  • B and Others v Attorney General
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 16 July 2003
    ...Appeal No. 1 of 2003 Privy Council From THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND [Delivered by Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead] 1 In Attorney-General v Prince [1998] 1 NZLR 262 a five judge Court of Appeal, by a majority of four to one, declined to strike out a claim in negligence brought by a child ......
  • Driver v Radio New Zealand Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 12 December 2019
    ...Network Television Ltd, the fifth defendant, was filed on 20 July 2017. 4 High Court Rules 2016, r 15.1. 5 Attorney-General v Prince [1998] 1 NZLR 262 (CA) at 267; and Couch v Attorney-General [2008] NZSC 45, [2008] 3 NZLR 725 at [33]. 6 Murray v Morel & Co Ltd [2007] NZSC 27, [2007] 3 NZLR......
  • Mark Stephen Hotchin v The New Zealand Guardian Trust Company Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 15 March 2016
    ...150 At [54]–[55]. 151 At [41]. 152 At [9]. 153 Applying the well-settled approach described in cases such as Attorney-General v Prince [1998] 1 NZLR 262 (CA): at [16] and [47]. 154 At [14]. 155 At [70]. 156 Royal Brompton Hospital NHS Trust v Hammond [2002] UKHL 14, [2002] 1 WLR 1397, dis......
  • D v East Berkshire Community NHS Trust and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 21 April 2005
    ...to child protection but might also reflect some distrust of civil juries. I should however refer to New Zealand authority. In Attorney-General v Prince and Gardner [1998] 1 NZLR 262 claims in negligence were made by the natural mother of a child who had been adopted, and also by the child ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • THE PROMISE OF UNIVERSALITY
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...the imposition of a tortious duty of care “would promote rather than undermine the mandatory statutory duty”); Attorney-General v Prince[1998] 1 NZLR 262 at 284 (the tortious duty does not conflict with the statutory duty but “enhances” it). 233 Reeves v Commissioner of Police of the Metrop......
  • Does “Prosecution” in the Law of Malicious Prosecution Extend to Malicious Civil Proceedings? A Commonwealth Update (part 1)
    • South Africa
    • Stellenbosch Law Review No. , May 2019
    • 27 May 2019
    ...full benets.106 The pl aint iff t hen br ought a n act ion for m alici ous prosecution claiming da mages.98 Attorney Ge neral v Prince 1998 1 NZLR 262 (CA).99 Deliu v Hong 2013 NZHC 735 para 88.100 2013 NZHC 2247. 101 Para 13.102 Par a 51.103 Para 56.104 2010 BWHC 297.105 Para 4.106 Paras ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT