Auckland Standards Committee v Andersen

CourtLawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
Neutral Citation[2012] NZLCDT 17
Citation[2012] NZLCDT 17
Year2012
Date29 June 2012

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 cases
  • Wellington Standards Committee v Twigley
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 19 December 2016
    ...Law Society [2011] 3 NZLR 850. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Hackshaw [2016] NZLCDT 18. 6 Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Andersen [2012] NZLCDT 17. 5 16 members must consider that the lawyer is, “… by reason of his or her conduct, not a fit and proper person to be a practitioner.” We r......
  • Wellington Standards Committee v Twigley
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 19 December 2016
    ...Law Society [2011] 3 NZLR 850. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Hackshaw [2016] NZLCDT 18. 6 Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Andersen [2012] NZLCDT 17. 5 16 members must consider that the lawyer is, “… by reason of his or her conduct, not a fit and proper person to be a practitioner.” We r......
  • Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Fendall
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 18 September 2018
    ...the New Zealand Law Society of Christchurch [2012] NZHC 1274. 9 Auckland Standards Committee 2 of the New Zealand Law Society v Anderson [2012] NZLCDT 17. 8 [19] Finally, in the matter of National Standards Committee v Toner10 a had been discharged without conviction after a theft of $200 w......
  • Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Fendall
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 18 September 2018
    ...the New Zealand Law Society of Christchurch [2012] NZHC 1274. 9 Auckland Standards Committee 2 of the New Zealand Law Society v Anderson [2012] NZLCDT 17. 8 [19] Finally, in the matter of National Standards Committee v Toner10 a had been discharged without conviction after a theft of $200 w......
  • Get Started for Free