Auckland Standards Committee v ABC
| Court | Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] NZLCDT 14 |
| Citation | [2012] NZLCDT 14 |
| Year | 2012 |
| Date | 28 June 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
LCRO 119/2016 XY, ZW, QM, and ABC Lawyers v TQ
...with the statutory requirements”. 69 Auckland Standards Committee v Pollard [2012] NZLCDT 21; Auckland Standards Committee v ABC [2012] NZLCDT 14. 70 Auckland Standards Committee v Sharma [2015] NZLCDT provided by trust account supervisors to the Law Society in the context of trust account ......
-
H v Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 of The New Zealand Law Society
...we consider the public interest in openness of these proceedings outweighs the practitioner’s private interest. 3 4 5 6 7 Re ABC [2012] NZLCDT 14. As articulated in X v Standards Committee (No 1) of the New Zealand Law Society CIV-2011404-7750 HC Auckland, 13 December 2011, affirmed on appe......
-
Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 2 v Mr M
...2016, Panckhurst J. H v Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 [2013] NZHC 2090. 9 Auckland Standards Committee No. 5 v ABC [2012] NZLCDT 14. 8 7 Consequential Orders We consider that it is proper for the order for repayment of the fee rendered to the complainant by the practitioner, i......
-
Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 2 v Mr M
...2016, Panckhurst J. H v Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee 1 [2013] NZHC 2090. 9 Auckland Standards Committee No. 5 v ABC [2012] NZLCDT 14. 8 7 Consequential Orders We consider that it is proper for the order for repayment of the fee rendered to the complainant by the practitioner, i......