Auckland Standards Committee v Sorensen
| Court | Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Neutral Citation | [2011] NZLCDT 10 |
| Citation | [2011] NZLCDT 10 |
| Year | 2011 |
| Date | 02 May 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
LCRO 174/2014 VS v DH
...Scott “Complaints against lawyers over estate administration”, (2017) LawTalk 905 at 38. 27 Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Sorensen [2011] NZLCDT 10 at [36] and 28.Lisette Scott, above n 26, at 40. 25 12 Discussion [51] Mrs VS stated at the hearing that apart from Mrs CN informing the fam......
-
LCRO 174/2014 VS v DH
...Scott “Complaints against lawyers over estate administration”, (2017) LawTalk 905 at 38. 27 Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Sorensen [2011] NZLCDT 10 at [36] and 28.Lisette Scott, above n 26, at 40. 25 12 Discussion [51] Mrs VS stated at the hearing that apart from Mrs CN informing the fam......
-
Auckland Standards Committee v Sorensen
...Mr Sorensen’s appeal against that 1 The facts and findings are fully set out in the Tribunal’s decision of 2 May 2011, recorded as [2011] NZLCDT 10. 4 decision,2 were noted by the Committee as demonstrating the serious dishonesty that had occurred. It recorded the fact that in dismissing hi......
-
Sorensen v New Zealand Law Society (auckland Standards Committee Number 2)
...given below I am satisfied that the Appellant should succeed on this ground of appeal. 8 9 Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Sorensen [2011] NZLCDT 10. S v New Zealand Law Society (Auckland Standards Committee Number 2), above n For the sake of completeness I note that the other grounds of a......