Auckland Standards Committee v Fendall

CourtLawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
Neutral Citation[2012] NZLCDT 1
Citation[2012] NZLCDT 1
Year2012
Date14 February 2012

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Fendall Hc Ak
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 2 August 2012
    ...v Complaints Committee No 2 of the Wellington District Law Society, above n 18, at [24]. 23 Webb, above n 17, at [4.3]. 24 Re Fendall [2012] NZLCDT 1 at 28 Re Fendall, above n 23, at [42]. 25 Daniels v Complaints Committee 2 of the Wellington District Law Society, above n 18, at [28]. 26 Se......
  • Auckland Standards Committee v Khan
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 18 March 2014
    ...that are set up to govern conduct will not treat lightly serious breaches of standards.” 4 Auckland Standards Committee v Fendall [2012] NZLCDT 1. ORDERS The orders that we make are as follows: 1. An order that the practitioner be suspended from practice as a barrister or solicitor for a pe......
  • Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Fendall
    • New Zealand
    • Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal
    • 6 August 2018
    ...receipt of the second period of income protection payments and was not meant to be working. 24 Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Fendall [2012] NZLCDT 1, hearing 31 January 2012, decision 14 February “[35] Mr Jones also noted that Ms Fendall … had improved her procedures and administrative s......