Ball v McIntyre

JurisdictionNew Zealand
CourtSupreme Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Jones v Scully
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Coleman v Power
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 1 Septiembre 2004
    ...of offensive behaviour, which often arises in relation to conduct undertaken in the exercise of political expression and action. In Ball v McIntyre14, Kerr J considered the conduct of a student who demonstrated against the Vietnam War by hanging a placard on a statue in Canberra. He decided......
  • Monis v The Queen; Droudis v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 27 Febrero 2013
    ...person, judicially constructed for the purpose of such statutory criteria, have been variously described. A ‘reasonable man’ in Ball v McIntyre89 was ‘reasonably tolerant and understanding, and reasonably contemporary in his reactions.’ A reasonable person was said, in the Supreme Court of ......
  • Morse v The Police Sc
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 6 Mayo 2011
    ...Act 1928 (Vic), s 25. Compare Police Offences Act 1927 (NZ), s 3D. 44 Worcester v Smith [1951] VLR 316 (SC) at 318. 45 Ball v McIntyre (1966) 9 FLR 237 (ACTSC) . See also Inglis v Fish [1961] VR 607 (SC) at 611 per Pape J; Ellis v Fingleton (1972) 3 SASR 437 (SC) at 443 per Mitchell J; Khan......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT