Bell-Booth Group Ltd v Attorney General
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 1989 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
39 cases
- Spring v Guardian Assurance Plc
-
Spring (A.P.) v Guardian Assurance Plc and Others
...As it is, I am of opinion that his decision upon it was wrong. The point has arisen more than once in New Zealand. In Bell-Booth Group Ltd. v. Attorney-General [1989] 3 N.Z.L.R. 148 the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries took part in a television broadcast the thrust of which was that a......
- Kapt (B) Haji Mohamad bin Ismail v Perwira Affin Bank Berhad (No 2)
-
Hamed v R
...118 At [55]. 119 At [60]. 120 At [58]–[59]. 121 At [65]–[67]. 122 At [74]–[75]. 123 At [87]–[88], citing Rural Timber Ltd v Hughes [1989] 3 NZLR 178 (CA) at 186 per Cooke 124 At [99]–[100]. 125 At [102]–[103]. 126 At [106]. 127 At [125]–[126]. 128 R v Williams [2007] NZCA 52, [2007] 3 NZLR ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Never say 'never' for the truth can hurt: defamatory but true statements in the tort of simple conspiracy.
...point concerning the defence of justification in defamation: see also at 202-3 (Stuart-Smith LJ). (11) Ibid 202 (emphasis added). (12) [1989] 3NZLR 148, (13) Lonrho [1994] 1 All ER 188, 211. (14) Ibid 198 (Dillon LJ), 205-8 (Stuart-Smith LJ), 212 (Evans LJ). The Court of Appeal was of the v......
-
IMPACT OF DEFAMATION ON NEGLIGENT MISSTATEMENTS
...is no Australian authority in point. 3 Stated by Lord Diplock in Horrocks v Lowe(1974) 1 All ER 662 at 668—9. 4 [1994] 3 All ER 129. 5 [1989] 3 NZLR 148 (CA). 6 [1941] 2 All ER 393, 399. This statement was accepted by the House of Lords in Spring, but it does not deal with the issue whether......