Bell v University of Auckland
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Thomas v University of Bradford
...will interfere". 34 We were also referred to some more modern cases which I should mention. 35 In Bell v. University of Auckland (1969) N.Z.L.R. 1029 the question of the Visitor's jurisdiction in relation to contracts was not resolved. The Judge merely decided that the Statement of Cla......
-
Royal Women's Hospital v Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria
... [1978] 1 All E.R. 1261 at 1265. 106 [1984] 3 All E.R. 313 at 318–319. 107 Especially per Lord Diplock [1978] A.C. 170 at 220. 108 [1969] N.Z.L.R. 1029 109 [1980] A.C. 1028 . 110 Per Lord Salmon at 1072; Lord Edmund-Davies, at 1073–1074, quoting Browne, L.J. in the Court of Appeal, [1979]......
-
Tom Ryan Cartage Limited v W Stevenson & Sons
...1 Compagnie Financiere et Commerciale du Pacifique v Peruvian Guano (1882) 11 QBD 55 (CA) at [53]. 2 Bell v University of Auckland [1969] NZLR 1029 (SC) at AMP Society v Architectural Windows Ltd [1986] 2 NZLR 190 (HC) at 202. [19] Relevance is to be determined by reference to the issues in......
-
Whk (nz) Limited and Anor v Retail Media Limited (in Rec & Liq) and ORS
...events were not in dispute and for that reason the documents were irrelevant. He submitted, relying on Bell v University of Auckland [1969] NZLR 1029 at 1034, that only documents relating to an issue actually in question in the action were discoverable, and documents relating to non-content......
Request a trial to view additional results