Bryan v Phillips New Zealand Ltd

JurisdictionNew Zealand
Date1995
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Fletcher v Commissioner of Public Works
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 21 February 2003
    ...that his decision could have any relevance to a fear of asbestos case. 164The next such case is Bryan v. Phillilps New ZealandLimited [1995] 1NZLR 633. This was a case where a New Zealand High Court judge refused to strike out an amended statement of claim in a fear of asbestos related dise......
  • Commerce Commission v Visy Board Pty Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 31 August 2012
    ...958 (SC) at 961 per McCarthy J. 95 At 961. 96 Seddon v Ryans Carriers Ltd (1992) 6 PRNZ 355 (HC) and Bryan v Philips New Zealand Ltd [1995] 1 NZLR 632 97 We have also held that jurisdiction could have been established under s 4 of the Act: at [85]–[86]. That basis of jurisdiction is not dep......
  • Body Corporate No. 338356 and Others v Endean and Others
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 28 October 2014
    ...Commission v Visy Board Pty Limited [2012] NZCA 383. 15 Seddon v Ryans Carriers Ltd (1992) 6 PRNZ 355 (HC); Bryan v Philips (NZ) Ltd [1995] 1 NZLR 632 16 Building Act 1991, s 91. 17 Building Act 2004, s 416(c). 18 Section 393. 19 And see Bowen v Paramount Builders (Hamilton) Limited [1997]......
  • Juken Nz Ltd v Red Stag Timber Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • 16 June 2023
    ...of fear or likelihood of asbestos-related harm to an allegation of actual harm was a new cause 38 Bryan v Philips New Zealand Ltd [1995] 1 NZLR 632 of action which was statute-barred and therefore not permitted. After referring to relevant authorities,39 Barker J said:40 Applying these test......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT