Canterbury Standards Committee v Sisson
| Neutral Citation | [2011] NZLCDT 35 |
| Citation | [2011] NZLCDT 35 |
| Year | 2011 |
| Date | 07 December 2011 |
| Court | Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Lewis v New Zealand Law Society
...professional misconduct, see Standards Committee (2) of the Canterbury Branch of the New Zealand Law Society Complaint Service v Sisson [2011] NZLCDT 35 (upheld on On 12 May 2015, the Tribunal found Ms Lewis guilty of unsatisfactory conduct in relation to a Family Court matter, where the Co......
-
Sisson v The Standards Committee (2) of The CANTERBURY-WESTLAND Branch of The New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service CA146/2014
...to be struck off the roll of Barristers and Solicitors? 1 2 3 New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal v Sisson [2011] NZLCDT 35 [Tribunal Sisson v The Standards Committee (2) of the Canterbury-Westland Branch of the New Zealand Law Society [2013] NZHC 349 [High Court judg......
-
Lewis v New Zealand Law Society
...professional misconduct, see Standards Committee (2) of the Canterbury Branch of the New Zealand Law Society Complaint Service v Sisson [2011] NZLCDT 35 (upheld on On 12 May 2015, the Tribunal found Ms Lewis guilty of unsatisfactory conduct in relation to a Family Court matter, where the Co......