Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Simes
| Court | Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Neutral Citation | [2012] NZLCDT 4 |
| Citation | [2012] NZLCDT 4 |
| Year | 2012 |
| Date | 05 April 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
LCRO 119/2016 XY, ZW, QM, and ABC Lawyers v TQ
...that responsibility. However, apart from reviewing Ms QM’s loan files in the 77 78 Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Simes [2012] NZLCDT 4 at JV v QG LCRO 65/2011 (13 September 2012) at [12], [34]. 39 “early stages” of the firm’s relationship with Mr TQ, [Mr XY] says thereafter he w......
-
LCRO 36/2018 AA v SM
...said so and would not have distributed the residue of her estate “in portions of 17 18 Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Simes [2012] NZLCDT 4 at XY, ZW, QM and ABC Lawyers v TQ LCRO 119/2016 (15 November 2018). 11 15 equal shares”. He says cl 9.3.4 is unclear and not to “a reasonab......
-
LCRO 36/2018 AA v SM
...said so and would not have distributed the residue of her estate “in portions of 17 18 Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Simes [2012] NZLCDT 4 at XY, ZW, QM and ABC Lawyers v TQ LCRO 119/2016 (15 November 2018). 11 15 equal shares”. He says cl 9.3.4 is unclear and not to “a reasonab......
-
Canterbury Westland Standards Committee v Simes
...it on the substantive matter, then the appropriate range was $7,500 $10,000. 1 2 Canterbury/Westland Standards Committee 2 v Simes [2012] NZLCDT 4. Ms Simes indicated that some of this amount is to be attributed to unrelated proceedings she has in the Court of Appeal, and accordingly she in......
Get Started for Free