Chandris Lines v Wilson & Horton Ltd

JurisdictionNew Zealand
Date1981
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 cases
  • Robert Tchenguiz and Another v Rawlinson and Hunter Trustees SA and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 26 Julio 2013
    ...Ms Phelps sought to rely in particular upon a passage in Passmore, p322 fn 68 and the case there cited from New Zealand, Chandris Lines v Wilson & Horton [1981] 2 NZLR 600. 72 I am unable to accept the thrust of these submissions. As to Chandris, it seems to me that, as submitted by Mr Trow......
  • JP Morgan Multi-Strategy Fund LP v Macro Fund Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 30 Mayo 2003
    ...communications (contra C. Tapper, n.91 above, 474 and C. Passmore, n.58 above, 184; also see Chandris Lines v. Wilson & Horton Ltd. [1981] 2 N.Z.L.R. 600 (H.C.), where this was actually the case). Witholding [sic] privileged communications from a court will have this effect, even if the inf......
  • Guttenbeil v Tower Insurance Ltd Hc Ak
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 13 Agosto 2012
    ...v Hawkins (No.2) [1990] 2 NZLR 175 (HC) at 180. … (ii) waiver can occur pre-trial Equiticorp: Chandris Lines Ltd v Wilson & Horton Ltd [1981] 2 NZLR 600 (HC). (iii) whether “a significant part” of privileged material has been disclosed as required by s 65(2) will depend on the substance rat......
  • Deutsche Babcock SA (Pty) Ltd v Babcock Africa (Pty) Ltd and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Trade Consultants Ltd (New Zealand High Court (Hamilton), case No M514/84, unreported). Vicom New Zealand Ltd v Vicomm Systems Ltd (1987) 2 NZLR 600 D Case Application in terms of s 48 of the Companies Act 61 of 1973 for an order declaring that applicant's name was not undesirable or calcul......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Some aspects of waiver of litigation privilege in commonwealth jurisdictions
    • Caribbean Community
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 9-2, December 1999
    • 1 Diciembre 1999
    ...J., commented that the test tilted the balance too tar against disclosure by protecting documents which were possibly produced 19 [1981] 2 NZLR 600. 20 [1959] 1 WLR 530. 21 [1935] 1NZLR596. for contemplated litigation but which were primarily produced in the ordinary course of business. H A......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT