Commissioner of Inland Revenue v NV Phillips' Gloeilampenfabrieken

JurisdictionNew Zealand
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date1955
Year1955
Date1955

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 cases
  • Kyros International Sdn Bhd v Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • R (on the application of Unison) v Monitor
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • Invalid date
    ...For example, there are two Court of Appeal decisions from New Zealand: Comr of Inland Revenue v NV Phillips’ Gloeilampenfabrieken [1955] NZLR 868 and Comr of Inland Revenue v Farmers’ Trading Co Ltd [1982] 1 NZLR 449. In the first the issue was whether interest received in the Netherlands f......
  • Ardmore Construction Ltd v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 June 2018
    ...been given in the UK. 19 Mr Way submits that the New Zealand case of Commissioner of Inland Revenue v NV Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken [1955] NZLR 868 (NZ CA) (“the Philips case”), considered by the Upper Tribunal, though only persuasive authority, supports his argument. The issue in the Phi......
  • SHIP VET SDN BHD vs KETUA PENGARAH HASIL DALAM NEGERI …
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 31 May 2021
    ...not ‘received’. This was explained in the Supreme Court case of Commissioner of Inland Revenue (NZ) v NV Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken [1955] NZLR 868, where it was explained by Barrowclough CJ, in the following The answer which I should expect the 'practical man' to make to a question what ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Taxing Sovereign Wealth Funds: Looking to Singapore for Inspiration
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 45-1, March 2017
    • 1 March 2017
    ...Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) ss 6–5(3), 6–10(5) (‘ITAA’). 17 Commissioner of Inland Revenue v N V Philips’ Gloeilampenfabrieken [1955] NZLR 868, 886–88 (North J). 18 Ibid 879–80 (Gresson J). In Spotless Services Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1993) 93 ATC 4397, 4409–4410 at......