Craig v Macgregor
| Judgment Date | 06 September 2019 |
| Neutral Citation | [2019] NZHC 2247 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 06 September 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Craig v Slater
...for defamation. The High Court determined that Mr Craig and Ms MacGregor defamed each other to a limited extent in Craig v MacGregor [2019] NZHC 2247.sleep with him, and that he had sexually harassed at least one other victim. 5 The other publications were either not defamatory, or protecte......
-
Craig v Macgregor
...A basis, with usual disbursements. 1 Craig v Slater [2020] NZCA 305 [ Craig v Slater (CA)]. 2 See [5]–[6] below. 3 Craig v MacGregor [2019] NZHC 2247 [High Court judgment]. See at [265]–[271] for a summary of the Judge's 4 Strictly, Ms MacGregor's claims took the form of counterclaims. Not......
-
Craig v Stringer
...v Stringer [2017] NZHC 50. 15 Craig v Stringer [2017] NZHC 3221. 16 Stringer v Craig [2020] NZHC 644. 17 At [161]. 18 Craig v MacGregor [2019] NZHC 2247. 19 High Court judgment, above n 20 Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1 (HL) at 22. 21 Hunter v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Po......
-
Craig v Macgregor
...schedules of his legal expenses, each of these leading to yet further reply submissions from the other party. 1 2 3 Craig v MacGregor [2019] NZHC 2247. Craig v MacGregor [2021] NZCA Craig v MacGregor [2021] NZSC 112. [6] The net result is I have received six further sets of submissions from......
Request a trial to view additional results