CREEDNZ Inc. v Governor-General

JurisdictionNew Zealand
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date1981
Year1981
Date1981

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
257 cases
  • R London Borough of Hillingdon v Mayor of London
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 15 December 2021
    ...process.” 117. The three categories of consideration were identified by Cooke J in the New Zealand Court of Appeal in CREEDNZ Inc v Governor General [1981] NZLR 172, 183: “What has to be emphasised is that it is only when the statute expressly or impliedly identifies considerations required......
  • FMA v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 27 June 2023
    ...matters are relevant and which are not, rather than apply the ordinary Wednesbury-based approach explained by Cooke J in CREEDNZ Inc v Governor General [1981] 1 NZLR 172, approved by the House of Lords in R v Findlay [1985] AC 318 per Lord Scarman at pages 333F – 334D. Mr Buttler further su......
  • R v Hillingdon Health Authority, ex parte Goodwin
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 808C–809A , 811C–D ) ... Dictum of Cooke J. in CREEDNZ Inc. v. Governor-General [ 1981 ] 1 N.Z.L.R. 172 , 182, applied ... The following cases ... ...
  • Minister of Health and Another NO v New Clicks South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others (Treatment Action Campaign and Another as Amici Curiae)
    • South Africa
    • 30 September 2005
    ...at 431 applied Commonwealth of Australia v Pharmacy Guild of Australia and Another 91 ALR 65: considered G CREEDNZ v Governor-General [1981] 1 NZLR 172 (CA): Dilworth and Others v Commissioner of Stamps [1899] AC 99: considered Doody v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Other Ap......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Apprehended Bias in Australian Administrative Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 38-3, September 2010
    • 1 September 2010
    ..., 529 [63]. See also Franklin v Minister of Town and Country Planning [1948] AC 87, 104 ('Franklin'); CREEDNZ In c v Governor-General [1981] 1 NZLR 172, 179 ('CREEDNZ Inc'); Hot Holdings (2002) 210 CLR 438, 455 [50]. 40 (1989) 100 ALR 383, 417 and to similar effect see Laws (1990) 170 CLR 7......
  • The Impact of Apartheid on Commonwealth Administrative Law
    • South Africa
    • Juta Acta Juridica No. , August 2019
    • 15 August 2019
    ...cf ibid 228 (Richardson J).68Ibid 224.69Ibid 230–32 (Richardson J) & 232 (Somers J).70Ibid 224. See also CREEDNZ Inc v Governor-General [1981] 1 NZLR 172 (CA) 183(Cooke J).71This analytical tool has been singled out as Sir Robin Cooke’s lasting contribution toadministrative law. See J McLea......