Daniel Clinton Fitzgerald v R
| Judgment Date | 07 October 2021 |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] NZSC 131 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
20 cases
-
Daniel Clinton Fitzgerald v R
...IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI MANA NUI SC 67/2020 [2021] NZSC 131 BETWEEN DANIEL CLINTON FITZGERALD Appellant AND THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 23 February 2021 Further submissions: 19 March 2021 Court: Winkelmann CJ, William Young, Glazebrook, O’Regan and Arnold JJ Counsel:......
-
Chisnall v The Attorney-General
...Bill of Rights Act: A Commentary (2nd ed, LexisNexis, Wellington, 2015) at [6.5.2]–[6.5.3] (footnotes omitted). 227 Fitzgerald v R [2021] NZSC 131 at [38], [47] and [78] per Winkelmann CJ, [160] and [175] per O'Regan and Arnold JJ and [241] and [244] per Glazebrook J. To similar effect are ......
-
Four Midwives, NZDSOS and NZTSOS v Minister For COVID-19 Response
...1; Cropp v Judicial Committee [2008] NZSC 46, [2008] 3 NZLR 774; D (SC 31/2019) v New Zealand Police [2021] NZSC 2; and Fitzgerald v R [2021] NZSC 131. the application of the Bill of Rights, which are explicitly preserved. Mr Perkins accepts the principle of legality is engaged in relation ......
-
Chisnall v The ATTORNEY-GENERAL
...Zealand Bill of Rights Act: A Commentary (2nd ed, LexisNexis, Wellington, 2015) at [6.5.2]–[6.5.3] (footnotes omitted). Fitzgerald v R [2021] NZSC 131 at [38], [47] and [78] per Winkelmann CJ, [160] and per O’Regan and Arnold JJ and [241] and [244] per Glazebrook J. To similar effect are th......
Get Started for Free