Davidson v Quirke
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Date | 1923 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
R v Kearley
... ... The following cases are referred to in their Lordships' opinions: ... Ares v. Venner ( 1970 ) 14 D.L.R. (3d) 4 ... Davidson v. Quirke [ 1923 ] N.Z.L.R. 552 ... Fingleton v. Lowen ( 1979 ) 20 S.A.S.R. 312 ... Kelly v. Purvis [ 1983 ] Q.B. 663 ; [ 1983 ... ...
- Pollitt v R
- R v Kearley
-
R. v. Kearley, (1992) 136 N.R. 81 (HL)
...E.R. 525, refd to. [para. 64]. Marshall v. Watt, Struthers and County, [1953] Tas. S.R. 1, not folld. [para. 84]. Davidson v. Quirke, [1923] N.Z.L.R. 552, not folld. [para. Lenthall v. Mitchell (1933), S.A.S.R. 231 (Sup. Ct.), not folld. [para. 93]. Mathewson v. Police, [1969] N.Z.L.R. 218,......
2 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...Corporation International Pty Ltd vAustralian Competition and ConsumerCommission [2002] 213 CLR 543 ......... 200Davidson v Quirke [1923] NZLR 552 ........ 114Deck v Missouri (No. 04–5293, 23 May2005) ...............................................................3 01Delcourt v Belgium (197......
-
Two English Hearsay Heresies
...for the purpose of supply. Therefore, the evidence is not evidence of an act withlegal effect or a verbal act.17 Davidson v Quirke [1923] NZLR 552, 556; Lenthall v Mitchell [1933] SASR 231, 242; Marsson vO’Sullivan [1951] SASR 244, 248; Hirst, above n. 5 at 66.18 J. Heydon, Cross on Evidenc......