Davidson v Quirke

JurisdictionNew Zealand
CourtSupreme Court
Date1923
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • R v Kearley
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 8 April 1992
  • Pollitt v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • R v Kearley
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • Invalid date
2 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The Nbr. 9-4, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...Corporation International Pty Ltd vAustralian Competition and ConsumerCommission [2002] 213 CLR 543 ......... 200Davidson v Quirke [1923] NZLR 552 ........ 114Deck v Missouri (No. 04–5293, 23 May2005) ...............................................................3 01Delcourt v Belgium (197......
  • Two English Hearsay Heresies
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The Nbr. 9-2, March 2005
    • 1 March 2005
    ...for the purpose of supply. Therefore, the evidence is not evidence of an act withlegal effect or a verbal act.17 Davidson v Quirke [1923] NZLR 552, 556; Lenthall v Mitchell [1933] SASR 231, 242; Marsson vO’Sullivan [1951] SASR 244, 248; Hirst, above n. 5 at 66.18 J. Heydon, Cross on Evidenc......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT