Donald v Baldwyn
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Court | Unspecified Court (New Zealand) |
| Date | 1953 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Antoniades v Villiers ; AG Securities v Vaughan
...which they give the appearance of creating." 22 Put more shortly, a sham exists where the parties say one thing intending another (Donald v. Baldwyn [1953] NZLR 313, 321 per F. B. Adams J.) 23 (3) "There is no reason why, if it is possible and properly done, agreements should not be entered......
-
Hilton v Plustitle Ltd
...16 As Bingham L.J. expressed it in Antoniades: "put more shortly a sham exists where the parties say one thing intending another. Donald v. Baldwyn (1953) NZLR 313, at 321 per F.B. Adams J." 17 In the present case the judge found as a fact that it was the intention of both parties, with all......
-
Somma v Hazelhurst
...unless there is a tenancy the case will escape the effects of the statute." This matter was also touched upon in a New Zealand decision, Donald v Baldwyn (1953) N.Z.R. 313 at p. 321, where F.B. Adams J. in the course of his judgment said this:- "The law will not be hoodwinked by shams but r......
-
TAN BOON AN vs LEE PENG TOO, 02-10-2021
...the appearance of creating. [102] Put simply, a sham exists where the parties say one thing intending another (see Donald v. Baldwyn [1953] NZLR 313, at 321, per FB Adams J). [103] In a world of genuine imitation, it is often not easy to discern a sham from what it really is in substance fo......