Dunlea v Attorney General

JurisdictionNew Zealand
Date2000
Year2000
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 cases
  • Attorney-General v Chapman Sc
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 16 September 2011
    ...denials of right. 71 In such public law remedy, the focus is on vindication of human rights. 72 That, as Thomas J pointed out in Dunlea v Attorney-General, may be contrasted with the general “loss-centred approach to damages”. 73 In Attorney-General of Trinidad and Tobago v Ramanoop, the Pr......
  • N Indra Nallathamby v Datuk Seri Khalid Abu Bakar
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2013
  • Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex Police
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 23 April 2008
    ...place a value on the fact the interest or right ought not to have been infringed at all". In a later case, Dunlea v Attorney General [2000] 3 NZLR 136, Thomas J drew a distinction between damages which were loss-centred and damages which were rights-centred. Damages awarded for the purpose ......
  • Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago v Ramanoop
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 23 March 2005
    ...observations of Cooke P in Simpson v Attorney-General (Baigent's case) [1994] 3 NZLR 667, 678, and the judgment of Thomas J in Dunlea v Attorney-General [2000] 3 NZLR 136, 17 Their Lordships view the matter as follows. Section 14 recognises and affirms the court's power to award remedies ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT