Dysart Timbers Ltd v Nielsen

JurisdictionNew Zealand
Year2009
Date2009
CourtSupreme Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
35 cases
  • Planet Kids Ltd v Auckland Council
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 17 December 2013
    ...Statutes Review (NZLC R25, 1993) 275 at 277. 36 Treitel, above n 32, at [2–036]; and Dysart Timbers Ltd v Nielsen [2009] NZSC 43, [2009] 3 NZLR 160 at [32] per Tipping and Wilson JJ and at [59] per McGrath 37 Hirji Mulji v Cheong Yue Steamship Co Ltd [1926] AC 497 (PC) at 505. See also Tre......
  • Bathurst Resources Ltd and another v L & M Coal Holdings Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 14 July 2021
    ...At [25]. 109 See generally McLauchlan, above n 102, for a discussion of these views. 110 Dysart Timbers Ltd v Nielsen [2009] NZSC 43, [2009] 3 NZLR 160 at [25], n 12 per Tipping and Wilson JJ and [62] and [64], n 43 per McGrath 111 Mobil Oil New Zealand Ltd v Development Auckland Ltd [2016......
  • Air New Zealand Ltd v BP Oil New Zealand Ltd and Others
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 28 May 2019
    ...Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10, [2009] 2 All ER 1127, [2009] 1 WLR 1988 at [27]. 18 Dysart Timbers Ltd v Nielsen [2009] NZSC 43, [2009] 3 NZLR 160 at [25] and 19 Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72, [2016] AC 742. 20 Mobil Oil N......
  • Ward Equipment Ltd v Preston
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 10 October 2017
    ...1 NZLR 48 at [81]. The Supreme Court in Mobil Oil referred to its earlier decision in Dysart Timbers Ltd v Neilsen [2009] NZSC 43, [2009] 3 NZLR 160 at [25] and [64] where Belize Telecom was endorsed but the continued relevance of the BP Refinery criteria acknowledged. The tension between B......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2015, December 2015
    • 1 December 2015
    ...the same condition as it was at the time of the offer, failing which the offer lapses), or Dysart Timbers Ltd v Roderick William Nielsen[2009] 3 NZLR 160 (‘Dysart Timbers’) (which had required the change in circumstances to be fundamental before the associated offer could be said to have la......
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...same condition as it was at the time of the offer, failing which the offer lapses), or Dysart Timbers Limited v Roderick William Nielsen[2009] 3 NZLR 160 (Dysart Timbers) (which had required the change in circumstances to be fundamental before the associated offer could be said to have laps......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT