Finnigan v New Zealand Rugby Football Union
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Date | 1985 |
| Year | 1985 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 cases
-
New Zealand Māori Council v Angela June Foulkes
...divide within the review jurisdiction in Knight “Privately Public” (2013) 24 PLR 108. Finnigan v New Zealand Rugby Football Union Inc [1985] 2 NZLR 159 (CA) at 178–179 and Stratford Racing Club Inc v Adlam [2008] NZCA 92, [2008] NZAR See for example Taylor Judicial Review: A New Zealand Per......
-
Body Corporate 162791 v Gilbert CA213/2014
...(CA) at 344. Antunovich v Dalmatinsko Kulturno Drustvo Inc [2001] NZAR 229 (HC) at [22]; Finnigan v New Zealand Rugby Football Union [1985] 2 NZLR 159 Companies Act 1993, s 31(2). Tisch v Body Corporate No 318596 [2011] NZCA 420, [2011] 3 NZLR 679 at [31]; St John’s College Trust Board v Bo......
-
James Robert Reid and Graeme Frederick Hale As Trustee of The Frederick Frank Trust v Carterton Auto Court Limited Trading As Mckenzie Motors and ORS HC
...issues. However even in such litigation the plaintiff/applicant must have some interest beyond the general public (Finnigan v NZRFU [1985] 2 NZLR 159). Mr Reid therefore should be removed as one of the applicants. I so Claim to be lay advocate [10] Mr Reid has, independent of his claim to b......
-
CIV CIV 2005-485-555
...rules of an incorporated society are a contract between the society and its members: Finnigan v New Zealand Rugby Football Union Inc [1985] 2 NZLR 159, 177. In this instance, NZTR could enforce its Constitution against the Club in contract, assuming it could establish a breach of an obligat......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Disciplined for `bringing a sport into disrepute': a framework for judicial review.
...challenge a decision of the federal body by virtue of a chain of contracts: see, eg, Finnigan v New Zealand Rugby Football Union Inc [1985] 2 NZLR 159, 178. See also Forbes, above n 20, (36) See, eg, Old Melburnians Football Club Inc v Victorian Amateur Football Association [2001] VSC 34 (U......
-
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC LAW: CHALLENGING THE PRECONCEPTIONS OF A TROUBLED TAXONOMY.
...Trim v North Dorset District Council [2011] 1 WLR 1901, 1907 [21]. It was stated in Finnigan v New Zealand Rugby Football Union Inc [1985] 2 NZLR 159, 179 that 'in the New Zealand context, a sharp boundary between public and private law cannot realistically be (150) Trim (n 149) 1907-8 [23]......