Grace v Orion New Zealand Ltd
Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
Judge | Gendall J |
Judgment Date | 12 April 2021 |
Neutral Citation | [2021] NZHC 705 |
Date | 12 April 2021 |
Docket Number | CIV-2017-409-000454 |
Court | High Court |
[2021] NZHC 705
Gendall J
CIV-2017-409-000454
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND
CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA
ŌTAUTAHI ROHE
Damages, Tort — claim for damages by 80 plaintiffs under the Forest and Rural Fires Act 1977, negligence and in nuisance for loss suffered as a result of two fires — the defendant operated an electricity network — the second defendant operated an Adventure Park — liability and causation under the Act — whether the second defendants acts or omissions had caused an outbreak of fire or a spread of fire — remoteness — whether the damage was foreseeable — reinstatement — betterment
C M Stevens, B R D Cuff, S K Battersby and C S M Henley for Plaintiffs
T C Weston QC, M Dennett, R J H Scott and S M Crosbie for First Defendant
G N Gallaway, W J Hamilton and L A Merrick for Second Defendant
This judgment was delivered by me on 31 March 2021 at 3 p.m. pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules.
Registrar/Deputy Registrar
Date:
Para No | |
Introduction | [1] |
Background | [13] |
Christchurch Adventure Park | [13] |
Summit Road Fire and the Chairlift Fire | [19] |
Timeline | [23] |
Monday 13 February 2017 | [24] |
Tuesday 14 February 2017 | [37] |
Wednesday 15 February 2017 | [59] |
Adventure Park's Fire Safety Management Plan (FSM Plan) | [82] |
Doppelmayr manual | [87] |
Damage caused by the fires | [89] |
Plaintiff's pleadings | [96] |
Section 43 of the Forest and Rural Fires Act 1997 (FRF Act) | [100] |
Liability under s 43 | [100] |
Causation under s 43 | [115] |
Was this an extraordinary event? | [121] |
Was this an “outbreak” of fire or simply a “spread” of fire? | [131] |
Conclusion on s 43 FRF Act | [147] |
Negligence | [149] |
Duty of care and the scope of that duty? | [154] |
Breach of the duty of care? | [170] |
– Flammability of Chairs? | [171] |
– Requirements for a competent chairlift operator | [175] |
Causation of loss by the breach and remoteness? | [182] |
Conclusion on negligence | [189] |
Nuisance | [190] |
Adventure Park created or participated in the creation of a nuisance? | [198] |
Adventure Park's land was used in a way that was unreasonable? | [202] |
Damage suffered was foreseeable? | [209] |
Conclusion on nuisance | [212] |
Damages | [213] |
Broadly “Non-contested” sums | [219] |
“Contested” sums | [221] |
Legal Framework | [223] |
Reinstatement | [234] |
Process for quantifying loss | [245] |
Flanagans' quantum claim — 165 Early Valley Road | [255] |
– Insured loss claim | [260] |
– Uninsured loss claim | [278] |
Cecile Grace's quantum claim — 349 Worsleys Road | [280] |
– Insured loss claim | [281] |
– Uninsured loss claim | [292] |
Kwons' quantum claim — 339 Worsleys Road | [305] |
– Insured loss claim | [309] |
– Uninsured loss claim | [313] |
Pflaums' quantum claim — 343 Worsleys Road | [332] |
Repair cost claims | [370] |
Betterment | [385] |
Interest | [410] |
Judgment | [419] |
Costs | [421] |
Two major fires occurred in the Port Hills area of Christchurch in February 2017. The plaintiffs were owners and in most cases residents of property, or business owners, in the area at the time. They and their properties were significantly affected by the fires. In this proceeding, the plaintiffs sue the two defendants for the consequences of the fires.
The first defendant Orion New Zealand Limited (Orion) operates an electricity network infrastructure business and had electricity conductors and equipment in the general area where the first of the fires was said to begin. This was alongside a roadway in the lower Port Hills area known as Early Valley Road. The outbreak of this first fire (the EVR Fire) is said to have begun around...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Grace v Orion New Zealand Limited
...meaning “any of the following kept in a registry of the court … (a) a register or an index …”. 1 2 Grace v Orion New Zealand Ltd [2021] NZHC 705. Senior Courts (Access to Court Documents) Rules 2017, rr 5 and If Fee Langstone has no relevant general right to access documents, r 11 otherwise......