Healy v Rauhina

JurisdictionNew Zealand
CourtUnspecified Court (New Zealand)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Maleb bin Su v PP and Cheak Yoke Thong v PP
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1984
  • Metropolitan Properties Company (F.G.C.) Ltd v Lannon
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 July 1968
    ...must be conceded that the tide of judicial opinion is to some extent In favour of the professor. Thus, in Healy v. Rouhina and anr. ( 1958 N.Z.L.R. 945), Mr, Justice Hutchinson, after reviewing the cases, said (at page 951) - "… The weight of authority now is that the test to be applie......
  • Eckhart v A.G.
    • Dominica
    • High Court
    • 6 April 1993
    ...LJ however did concede that the tide of judicial opinion was to some extent in favour of Professor Smiths view citing Healy v Rauhina [1958] NZLR 945 and R v Barnsley County Borough Licensing Justices [1960] 2 All E.R. pp 714, 715 in that regard; but as he approached the conclusion of his j......
  • Pittiman et Al v Benjamin et Al
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal
    • 3 April 1985
    ...of the former are: R. v. Camborne Justices [1955] 1 Q.B. 41; Reg. v. Barnsley Licensing Justices [1960] 2 Q.B. 167; Healey v. Ramhina [1958] N.Z.L.R. 945. 83 Those in favour of the latter test are: Allinson v. General Council of Medical Education and Registration [1894] 1 Q.B. 750; R v. Sus......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT