Healy v Rauhina
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Date | 1958 |
| Court | Unspecified Court (New Zealand) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
- Maleb bin Su v PP and Cheak Yoke Thong v PP
-
Metropolitan Properties Company (F.G.C.) Ltd v Lannon
...must be conceded that the tide of judicial opinion is to some extent In favour of the professor. Thus, in Healy v. Rouhina and anr. ( 1958 N.Z.L.R. 945), Mr, Justice Hutchinson, after reviewing the cases, said (at page 951) - "… The weight of authority now is that the test to be applied is ......
-
Eckhart v A.G.
...LJ however did concede that the tide of judicial opinion was to some extent in favour of Professor Smiths view citing Healy v Rauhina [1958] NZLR 945 and R v Barnsley County Borough Licensing Justices [1960] 2 All E.R. pp 714, 715 in that regard; but as he approached the conclusion of his j......
-
Pittiman et Al v Benjamin et Al
...of the former are: R. v. Camborne Justices [1955] 1 Q.B. 41; Reg. v. Barnsley Licensing Justices [1960] 2 Q.B. 167; Healey v. Ramhina [1958] N.Z.L.R. 945. 83 Those in favour of the latter test are: Allinson v. General Council of Medical Education and Registration [1894] 1 Q.B. 750; R v. Sus......