John Douglas Mckenzie v R
Judgment Date | 11 November 2013 |
Neutral Citation | [2013] NZSC 109 |
Court | Supreme Court |
Date | 11 November 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Kayrouz v R
...above n 12. 20 R v Platten, above n 13, at [35]. 21 At [36], following R v Barham [1997] 2 Cr App R 119 (CA). 22 R v McKenzie [2013] NZSC 109. 23 At 24 R v Humphries [1982] 1 NZLR 353 (CA) at 356. 25 R v Mahutoto [2001] 2 NZLR 115 (HC). 26 At [47]. 27 R v Morris (Lee), above n 6. 28 At [33......
-
Henderson v R
...day before the incriminating texts. R v Holtham [2008] 2 NZLR 758 (HC) at [45]; and McKenzie v R [2013] NZCA 378. See also McKenzie v R [2013] NZSC 109 at messages were a conversation between Wiremu and Grace, but failed to do so. However, as submitted by the Crown, it is only the elements ......
-
R v Austen
...is endorsed in Preston, above n 9 at [43]. It has been referred to without criticism in Charlton v R [2016] NZCA 212; and McKenzie v R [2013] NZSC 109 application for leave decision). Mrs Treadwell is clearly unavailable given her death. The Crown’s hearsay notice meets the notice requireme......