Levi Strauss & Company v Kimbyr Investments
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Date | 1994 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
- BP Plc (formerly known as BP AMOCO Plc) v Woolworths Ltd
- Patience & Nicholson (NZ) Ltd v Cyclone Hardware Pty Ltd
- Woolworths Ltd v Bp Plc
-
RB (Hygiene Home) Australia Pty Ltd v Henkel Australia Pty Ltd
...v Sterling Pharmaceuticals Pty Limited (1991) 30 FCR 326; [1991] FCA 402 Levi Strauss & Co v Kimbyr Investments Ltd (1993) 28 IPR 249; [1994] NZLR 332 Martin & Pleasance Pty Ltd v A Nelson & Co Ltd [2021] FCAFC 80 Midas Australia Pty Ltd v Ravecroft Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 771 Mishawaka Rubber &......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Frucor gets the green light and maintains its V green trademark registration
...of the trade mark for the purposes of assessing use? In the High Court decision in Levi Strauss & Co v Kimbyr Investments [1994] 1 NZLR 332, Williams J held that the written explanation of the mark defines the trade mark and not the image of the mark on the "the opening words of the written......