Lewis v Wilson & Horton Ltd

JurisdictionNew Zealand
CourtCourt of Appeal
Judgment Date2000
Year2000
Date2000

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
180 cases
  • Trans-Tasman Resources Ltd v Taranaki-Whanganui Conservation Board
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 30 September 2021
    ...Jacinta Ruru “Landmark EPA Decision” [2014] NZLJ 284 at 285. 250 CA judgment, above n 45, at [171]. 251 See Lewis v Wilson & Horton Ltd [2000] 3 NZLR 546 (CA) at [81]; and Harry Woolf and others De Smith's Judicial Review (8th ed, Thomson Reuters, London, 2018) at [7–105]–[7–106]. See also ......
  • Trans-Tasman Resources Ltd v Taranaki-Whanganui Conservation Board
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 30 September 2021
    ...Jacinta Ruru “Landmark EPA Decision” [2014] NZLJ 284 at 285. 250 CA judgment, above n 45, at [171]. 251 See Lewis v Wilson & Horton Ltd [2000] 3 NZLR 546 (CA) at [81]; and Harry Woolf and others De Smith's Judicial Review (8th ed, Thomson Reuters, London, 2018) at [7–105]–[7–106]. See also ......
  • TRANS-TASMAN Resources Limited v TARANAKI-WHANGANUI Conservation Board,
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 30 September 2021
    ...We believe that everything has a mauri or a life force and that mauri must be protected. 251 252 253 See Lewis v Wilson & Horton Ltd [2000] 3 NZLR 546 (CA) at [81]; and Harry Woolf and others De Smith’s Judicial Review (8th ed, Thomson Reuters, London, 2018) at [7-105]–[7-106]. See also Bel......
  • TRANS-TASMAN Resources Limited v TARANAKI-WHANGANUI Conservation Board,
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 30 September 2021
    ...We believe that everything has a mauri or a life force and that mauri must be protected. 251 252 253 See Lewis v Wilson & Horton Ltd [2000] 3 NZLR 546 (CA) at [81]; and Harry Woolf and others De Smith’s Judicial Review (8th ed, Thomson Reuters, London, 2018) at [7-105]–[7-106]. See also Bel......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • ‘Australian Exceptionalism’ in Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 36-1, March 2008
    • 1 March 2008
    ...Reimbold and Strick Ltd [2002] 3 All ER 385; Mousaka Inc v Golden Seagull Maritime Inc [2002] 1 WLR 395; Lewis v Wilson and Horton Ltd [2000] 3 NZLR 546, 567 (Elias CJ). 91 One of the recommendations of the Donoughmore Committee (UK) in 1932 was that reasons should be given for quasi-judici......