Mamat v Mamat

Judgment Date11 April 2018
Neutral Citation[2018] NZHC 639
CourtHigh Court
Date11 April 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Woolf v Kaye
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 24 August 2018
    ...of liability under the 72 73 74 75 76 Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council, above n 6. Mamat v Mamat [2018] NZHC 639. At At [113]. At [117]. mortgage, meaning that the presumption of a resulting trust applied not in relation to the entire share, but a shar......
  • Young v Young
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 19 November 2020
    ...7, at [40]. 13 At [42] referring to William Swadling “Explaining Resulting Trusts” (2008) 124 LQR 72 at 74. 14 At [44]. 15 Mamat v Mamat [2018] NZHC 639. 16 At 17 GE Dal Pont Equity and Trusts in Australia (7th ed, Thomson Reuters, Sydney, 2019) at [26.85]. 18 Calverley v Green (1984) 155 C......
  • Young v Young
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 19 November 2020
    ...v Mamat.15 As far as I am aware that is the only judgment in this jurisdiction which has considered the 14 15 At [44]. Mamat v Mamat [2018] NZHC 639. issue. In coming to his decision Davidson J noted the absence of any New Zealand judicial or other commentary16 but referred to Equity and Tr......
  • Wulff v Demarco
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 18 November 2021
    ...to the relationship property context but are part of a wider concept: Li v 110 Formosa (NZ) Ltd [2020] NZCA 492 at [136]. Mamat v Mamat [2018] NZHC 639, (2018) 19 NZCPR 331 at Mr DeMarco’s right to share in the proceeds of sale of the P-40 pursuant to cl 2 of the P-40 side letter. [125] I n......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT