Mamat v Mamat
Judgment Date | 11 April 2018 |
Neutral Citation | [2018] NZHC 639 |
Court | High Court |
Date | 11 April 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Woolf v Kaye
...of liability under the 72 73 74 75 76 Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council, above n 6. Mamat v Mamat [2018] NZHC 639. At At [113]. At [117]. mortgage, meaning that the presumption of a resulting trust applied not in relation to the entire share, but a shar......
-
Young v Young
...7, at [40]. 13 At [42] referring to William Swadling “Explaining Resulting Trusts” (2008) 124 LQR 72 at 74. 14 At [44]. 15 Mamat v Mamat [2018] NZHC 639. 16 At 17 GE Dal Pont Equity and Trusts in Australia (7th ed, Thomson Reuters, Sydney, 2019) at [26.85]. 18 Calverley v Green (1984) 155 C......
-
Young v Young
...v Mamat.15 As far as I am aware that is the only judgment in this jurisdiction which has considered the 14 15 At [44]. Mamat v Mamat [2018] NZHC 639. issue. In coming to his decision Davidson J noted the absence of any New Zealand judicial or other commentary16 but referred to Equity and Tr......
-
Wulff v Demarco
...to the relationship property context but are part of a wider concept: Li v 110 Formosa (NZ) Ltd [2020] NZCA 492 at [136]. Mamat v Mamat [2018] NZHC 639, (2018) 19 NZCPR 331 at Mr DeMarco’s right to share in the proceeds of sale of the P-40 pursuant to cl 2 of the P-40 side letter. [125] I n......