Mathias Ortmann v United States of America

Judgment Date04 November 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] NZSC 120
CourtSupreme Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 cases
  • Daniel Clinton Fitzgerald v R
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 7 October 2021
    ...there. That is the effect of s 3 of the Bill of Rights. Yet the Crown’s 158 159 160 See n 117 above. Ortmann v United States of America [2020] NZSC 120, [2020] 1 NZLR 475 at [96], citing New Zealand Air Line Pilots’ Assoc Inc v Attorney-General [1997] 3 NZLR 269 (CA) at Ye v Minister of Imm......
  • Daniel Clinton Fitzgerald v R
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 7 October 2021
    ...there. That is the effect of s 3 of the Bill of Rights. Yet the Crown’s 158 159 160 See n 117 above. Ortmann v United States of America [2020] NZSC 120, [2020] 1 NZLR 475 at [96], citing New Zealand Air Line Pilots’ Assoc Inc v Attorney-General [1997] 3 NZLR 269 (CA) at Ye v Minister of Imm......
  • Mathias Ortmann v United States of America
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 4 November 2020
    ...SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI MANA NUI SC 54/2018 [2020] NZSC 120 BETWEEN MATHIAS ORTMANN First Appellant BRAM VAN DER KOLK Second Appellant FINN HABIB BATATO Third Appellant AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA First Respondent DISTRICT COURT AT NORTH SHORE Second Respondent SC 55/2018 BE......
  • D (sc 31/2019) v New Zealand Police
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 9 February 2021
    ...Tribunal [2015] NZSC 28, [2016] 1 NZLR 298 at [143] per McGrath J and [207] per Glazebrook J; and Ortmann v United States of America [2020] NZSC 120 at [96] and Section 25(g) of the Bill of Rights [166] The approach to the application of the Bill of Rights was set out by a majority of this ......
  • Get Started for Free