Mclanahan v The New Zealand Registered Architects Board
| Judgment Date | 26 September 2016 |
| Neutral Citation | [2016] NZHC 2276 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 26 September 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Unison Networks Limited v Solar City New Zealand Limited
...on 65 66 See for example Registered Architects Act 2005, ss 24(2) and 38 and McLanahan v New Zealand Registered Architects Board [2016] NZHC 2276. Electricity Industry (Enforcement) Regulations 2010, reg the Panel or which would support the proposition Parliament intended to change or broad......
-
Mclanahan & Anor v The New Zealand Registered Architects Board
...contract is the subject of a civil claim by the firm in the High Court. 4 McLanahan v The New Zealand Registered Architects Board [2016] NZHC 2276. [8] In March 2014 the appellants decided, irrespective of the outcome of contractual dispute, to lay a complaint about Mr McDougall with the Bo......
-
Mclanahan v The New Zealand Registered Architects Board
...was a slip and inquire whether another meaning might have been intended. 2 3 McLanahan v The New Zealand Registered Architects Board [2016] NZHC 2276 at We consider this fits into the third category set out in Horowhenua County v Nash (No 2) [1968] NZLR 632 (SC) at 633 of “some other very s......