Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Date | 2000 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
38 cases
- Nsw Council for Civil Liberties Inc. v Classification Review Board (No. 2)
-
Attorney-General v Arthur William Taylor
... [2007] NZSC 7, [2007] 3 NZLR 1. 31 At [253]. See also the comments at [254] and [259]. 32 Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review [2000] 2 NZLR 9 (CA) at 33 See, for example, R v Poumako [2000] 2 NZLR 695 (CA). In that case Thomas J (dissenting) would have granted a declaration: at [7......
-
New Health New Zealand Inc. v South Taranaki District Council and another
...as principled rather than prescriptive …”) and at [93] (“The Moonen approach [referring to Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review [2000] 2 NZLR 9 (CA) ( Moonen No 1)] was not intended to be mandatory”); and McGrath J at [191] (“it will usually be appropriate for a court first to consi......
-
Taylor v Attorney-General of New Zealand
...in which a proceeding had been “commenced for the purpose of seeking the declaration as a stand-alone remedy”. 51 42 In Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review, 52 Tipping J, for the Court of Appeal, 53 said that the incorporation of a provision in the form of s 5 into a Bill of Rights......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Courts invited to speak up on rights
...NZLR 791 at [70]. 3 Attorney-General v Taylor [2017] NZCA 215; [2017] 3 NZLR 24 at [162]. 4 Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review [2000] 2 NZLR 9 (CA) at [20]; R v Hansen [2007] NZSC 7 [2007] 3 NZLR 1 at [253]. See also R v Poumako [2000] 2 NZLR 692 (CA) at [99]; and Quilter v Attorn......
11 books & journal articles
-
A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The UK or Canada as a Model?
...3. 23 Human Rights Act 1998 (UK) c 42, s 4. 24 Human Rights Act 1998 (UK) c 42, s 4(6). 25 Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review [2000] 2 NZLR 9. 26 Tate, above n 16, 234. 27 Jeremy Waldron, 'Some Models of Dialogue Between Judges and Legislators' in Grant Huscroft and Ian Brodie (ed......
-
Constitutional Limits on Bills of Rights Introduced by a State or Territory
...17 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 323, 339. 42 Bill of Rights Act 1990 (NZ) ss 4, 5. 43 Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review [2000] 2 NZLR 9, 17 (emphasis added); see also Quilter v A-G [1998] 1 NZLR 523, 554 (Thomas J); Manga v A-G of New Zealand [2000] 2 NZLR 65, 84 (Hammond J); ......
-
Human Rights Protection in Australia: Interpretation Provisions and Parliamentary Supremacy
...Appeal cases involving the Bill of Rights Act, ss 4 and 6, see R v Pora [2001] 2 NZLR 37; Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review [2000] 2 NZLR 9; Simpson v Attorney-General [1994] 3 NZLR 667 ('Baigent's Case'). See generally Grant Huscroft and Paul Rishworth (eds), Rights and Freedoms......
-
Human Rights Protection in Australia: Interpretation Provisions and Parliamentary Supremacy
...Appeal cases involving the Bill of Rights Act, ss 4 and 6, see R v Pora [2001] 2 NZLR 37; Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review [2000] 2 NZLR 9; Simpson v General [1994] 3 NZLR 667 ('Baigent's Case'). See generally Grant Huscroft and Paul Rishworth (eds), Rights and Freedoms: The New......
Request a trial to view additional results