New Zealand Law Society v Dorbu
| Court | Lawyers and Conveyancers’ Disciplinary Tribunal |
| Neutral Citation | [2011] NZLCDT 24 |
| Citation | [2011] NZLCDT 24 |
| Year | 2011 |
| Date | 30 September 2011 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
-
Deliu v Hong & Another
...9 10 11 12 Re Bell [2005] QCA151. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee v Parlane [2010] NZLCDT 8. New Zealand Law Society v Dorbu [2011] NZLCDT 24. Tribunal decision at The Tribunal erred in law in finding that Mr Hong’s communications were unconnected with the provision of regulated s......
-
Legal Complaints Review Officer v Hong
...taken cumulatively, there is no doubt that the conduct 26 See note 6 at paragraph [157]. At [161]. 28 New Zealand Law Society v Dorbu [2011] NZLCDT 24 at Lawyers’ Professional Responsibility v Dal Pont 5 ed. 30 This is a reference to the decision in Dore v Barreau du Quebec [2012] SCC 12 at......
-
Legal Complaints Review Officer v Hong
...taken cumulatively, there is no doubt that the conduct 26 See note 6 at paragraph [157]. At [161]. 28 New Zealand Law Society v Dorbu [2011] NZLCDT 24 at Lawyers’ Professional Responsibility v Dal Pont 5 ed. 30 This is a reference to the decision in Dore v Barreau du Quebec [2012] SCC 12 at......
-
Legal Complaints Review Officer v Hong
...of Mr Dorbu’s breaches of core and fundamental obligations was serious.30 28 Ibid, at [85] and [92]. New Zealand Law Society v Dorbu [2011] NZLCDT 24. 30 Ibid, at [35] and In considering the charge of misconduct against Mr Hong, with its requirement that his misconduct be at a level justify......
Get Started for Free