Nicholas v Ingram

JurisdictionNew Zealand
CourtSupreme Court
Date1958
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Lian Seng Company Sdn Bhd; Sekemas Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • Supreme Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Waitarere Rise Ltd v Re Rangi and Sj Rangi Hc Pmn
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 16 March 2010
    ...[1967] NZLR 405 at 414. Not only is it doubtful whether “mere financial inability” can amount to great hardship ( Nicholas v Ingram [1958] NZLR 972), but the Court must also consider whether on the other hand an order for specific performance would cause hardship to the plaintiff. In my vie......
  • Mangawhai Developments Ltd ((in Receivership)) v Mark Robinson Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 16 February 2011
    ...NZ Ltd, Wellington) at 77 ff. 13 The particular type of security was a “participatory security”: see Securities Act 1978 ss 2 and 2D. 14 [1958] NZLR 972. 15 Butler et al, Equity and Trusts in New Zealand (2nd ed, Thomson Reuters, 2009) at [24.4.4] and 16 Peter Blanchard and Andrew Barker, C......
  • Millbrook Country Club Limited v S F M Investments Limited and
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 10 December 2009
    ...not be ordered because of great hardship to the defendant. The relevant authorities are referred to by Hutchison J. in Nicholas v Ingram [1958] NZLR 972. The learned Judge’s views as to the effect of authorities may be summarised as follows: (a) the hardship that operates as a defence must,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT