Nicholas v Ingram
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Date | 1958 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
- Lian Seng Company Sdn Bhd; Sekemas Sdn Bhd
-
Titanic Quarter Ltd v Neil Rowe
...would not amount to a defence to an application for specific performance. See Roberts v O’Neill (1983) IR 47; Nicholas v England (1958) NZLR 972 and Snell on Equity 31st Edition page 495ff. The remedy is customarily awarded, partly on the basis that damages are not an adequate remedy. This ......
-
Waitarere Rise Ltd v Re Rangi and Sj Rangi Hc Pmn
...[1967] NZLR 405 at 414. Not only is it doubtful whether “mere financial inability” can amount to great hardship ( Nicholas v Ingram [1958] NZLR 972), but the Court must also consider whether on the other hand an order for specific performance would cause hardship to the plaintiff. In my vie......
-
Millbrook Country Club Limited v S F M Investments Limited and
...not be ordered because of great hardship to the defendant. The relevant authorities are referred to by Hutchison J. in Nicholas v Ingram [1958] NZLR 972. The learned Judge’s views as to the effect of authorities may be summarised as follows: (a) the hardship that operates as a defence must,......
Request a trial to view additional results