Pakai & Harrison v R
Judgment Date | 20 July 2016 |
Neutral Citation | [2016] NZCA 343 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
Date | 20 July 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Simon v R
...that is not self-defence. However the fact that the defendant may have been the initial aggressor or initially sought 4 Pakai v R [2016] NZCA 343 at [23]; and Stepanicic v R [2015] NZCA 35 at out the complainant in order to exact revenge or retribution, will not of itself rule out self-defe......
-
R v Cochrane
...was left undisturbed on appeal.4 1 2 3 4 Sentencing Act 2002, s 103. See R v Taueki [2005] 3 NZLR 372 (CA) at [32(a)]. Pakai v R [2016] NZCA 343. Pukeroa v R [2013] NZCA However, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal on the basis that a two-year discount should have been given for what it ......
-
Buckingham v Police
...she believed them to be. [33] 10 11 The circumstances as Ms Buckingham believed them to be were as follows: See, for example, Pakai v R [2016] NZCA 343 and the discussion in Adams on Criminal Law Offences and Defences (online looseleaf ed, Thomson Reuters) at [CA48]. Police v Buckingham, ab......
-
Dillin Pakai v R
...was associated with a different chapter of the Mongrel Mob. Once there, they asked to see Mr EE. His partner, Ms MN, went 1 Pakai v R [2016] NZCA 343 (Randerson, Harrison and Stevens to telephone him. Mr Harrison and Mr Pakai then left, saying they would return. After they had left, Ms MN d......