Peters v Cushing
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Date | 1999 |
| Year | 1999 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Buchanan v Jennings
...that the non-privileged statement was made by Mr Jennings after the absolutely privileged statement in Parliament. In Peters v Cushing [1999] NZAR 241 the defendant defamed the plaintiff, but without naming or identifying him, in television interviews broadcast on 1 and 3 June 1992. His rem......
-
Jennings v. Buchanan, [2004] N.R. Uned. 160
...that the non-privileged statement was made by Mr. Jennings after the absolutely privileged statement in Parliament. In Peters v. Cushing [1999] NZAR 241 the defendant defamed the plaintiff, but without naming or identifying him, in television interviews broadcast on 1 and 3 June 1992. His r......
-
PETERS v TVNZ and Anor HC AK
...v Television New Zealand Ltd [1994] 3 NZLR 1 (PC). 14 At 11. 15 Peters v Cushing [1994] 3 NZLR 30 (CA) at 31. 16 Peters v Cushing [1999] NZAR 241 (HC) at 17 At 251. 18 Buchanan v Jennings [2002] 3 NZLR 145 (CA). 19 At [57] per Richardson P, Gault, Keith and Blanchard JJ (Tipping J dissentin......
-
Peters v Tvnz and
...he would refer to and rely on the full wording of the Hansard 15 16 17 Peters v Cushing [1994] 3 NZLR 30 (CA) at 31. Peters v Cushing [1999] NZAR 241 (HC) at At 251. report of parliamentary proceedings at trial to establish that Mr Jennings made the alleged comments. [35] In Buchanan v Jenn......