R v Child

JurisdictionNew Zealand
CourtUnspecified Court (New Zealand)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 cases
  • McPhail v Persons, Names Unknown; Bristol Corporation v Ross
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 24 May 1973
    ...Sayer 225; but, even if this is no longer true (2) in any case the statutes only apply to the expulsion of one who is in possession, see Reg. v. Child (1846) 2 Cox Cr. C. 1C2. They do not apply to the expulsion of a trespasser who has no possession. The owner was not civilly liable because ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT