R v Hansen
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Judgment Date | 2007 |
| Neutral Citation | [2007] NZSC 7 |
| Date | 2007 |
| Year | 2007 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
153 cases
-
Attorney-General v Arthur William Taylor
...process that legislation is inconsistent with the Bill of Rights. The classic illustration of this is provided by this Court's decision in R v Hansen which found that the reverse onus presumption of supply in the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, applying to those in possession of controlled drugs ......
-
Siemer v The Solicitor-General
...(CA) at 129 per Cooke J. 28 R v Forbes [2001] 1 AC 473 (HL) at [24] and Brown v Scott [2003] 1 AC 681 (PC) at 693. See also R v Hansen [2007] NZSC 7, [2007] 3 NZLR 1 at [38]; R v Stewart (Eric) [2009] NZSC 53, [2009] 3 NZLR 425 at [33]; Randall v R [2002] UKPC 19, [2002] 1 WLR 2237 at......
-
New Health New Zealand Inc. v South Taranaki District Council and another
...whether the discrimination – or in the present case compulsory medical treatment – is justified in a free and democratic society). In R v Hansen, the Chief Justice said interpretation of the scope of rights under the Bill of Rights Act and the question of justification under s 5 should be k......
-
Ministry of Health v Peter Atkinson (on Behalf of The Estate of Susan Atkinson)
...36 At [137]. 37 At [133]. 38 At [133]. 39 High Court judgment at [134] and see discussion below at [138]. 40 At [134]. 41 R v Hansen [2007] NZSC 7, [2007] 3 NZLR 1 at [104]. 42 At [218]. 43 At [157]. 44 For ease of reference we will refer only to differential treatment. 45 Robert Walker “T......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Courts invited to speak up on rights
...[2017] NZCA 215; [2017] 3 NZLR 24 at [162]. 4 Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review [2000] 2 NZLR 9 (CA) at [20]; R v Hansen [2007] NZSC 7 [2007] 3 NZLR 1 at [253]. See also R v Poumako [2000] 2 NZLR 692 (CA) at [99]; and Quilter v Attorney-General [1998] 1 NZLR 523 (CA) per Thomas J......
7 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...No. IT-01-47) Decision onAdmissibility of Documents of the Defenceof Enver Hadžihasanović, 22June 2005 . . . 18Hansen vR [2007] NZSC7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281Harrison v State, 644 NE 2d 1243 (1995),Supreme Courtof Indiana. . . . . 196–197, 198Heaney vIreland [1994] 3IR 593 . . ......
-
Table of Cases
...JC 190, HCJ . . . 115Hamilton v General Manufacturing Co. [2000]OJ No 1636, Gen Div . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53Hansen v R [2007] NZSC 7 . . . . . . . . 221, 223, 228Harris v DPP [1952] AC 694. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78Hasson v HMA 1971 SLT 199 . . . . . . . . . . 160, ......
-
Authenticating ‘Things’ in English Law: Principles for Adducing Tangible Evidence in Common Law Jury Trials
...established beyond reasonable doubt inCanada: RvAdam [2006] BCSC 1430 at [25]–[26].76 The arguments for presuming innocence (see Hansen vR[2007] NZSC 7 at [196]–[198]) have noapplication unless admission of the evidence has a conclusive effect with respect to guilt. For acritique of the sta......
-
Noticeboard
...(pre-2005) or ‘presumed’ (post-2005) to possess it for the purpose of saleor supply ‘until the contrary is proved’. In Hansen vR[2007] NZSC 7 the appellantcontended, contrary to the long-standing view of the New Zealand courts, thatproving the contrary means raising a reasonable doubt that ......
Request a trial to view additional results