R v Matenga
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Judgment Date | 2009 |
| Neutral Citation | [2009] NZSC 18 |
| Date | 2009 |
| Year | 2009 |
| Court | Supreme Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
126 cases
-
Jamie Ngahuia Ahsin v R and Raeleen Matewai Noyle Rameka v R
...only becomes apparent which provision of s 66 is most appropriate to rely on after the evidence has been heard at trial. 129 Matenga v R [2009] NZSC 18, [2009] 3 NZLR 130 At [30]. 131 At [31]. 132 Mason v R [2010] NZSC 129, [2011] 1 NZLR 296. 133 R v Mead [2002] 1 NZLR 594 (CA). 134 R v Ch......
-
R v Kenneth James Noye
...of fresh evidence on the safety of a conviction. Miss Montgomery did however go further and drew attention to Weiss v R [2005] HCA 81, and R v Mantenga [2009] NZSC 18, the first a decision of the High Court of Australia, and the second a decision of the Supreme Court of New Zealand. In both......
-
Lundy v The Queen
...approach its assessment of whether there was a miscarriage of justice. That difference ended with the decision of the Supreme Court in R v Matenga [2009] 3 NZLR 145. In that case the Supreme Court followed much the same approach as had been advocated by Lord Bingham in Pendleton, although i......
-
Ashley Dwayne Guy v R
...of the trial. That point is not, however, reached if the errors are such that the trial itself is properly characterised as unfair. 34 In R v Matenga, this Court made it clear that before applying the proviso the Court would have to be “satisfied that the trial was fair and thus that there ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Case Commentaries
...of justice’ and a ‘substantial’ miscarriageof justice was recently examined by the Supreme Court of New Zealand in MatengavThe Queen [2009] NZSC 18. This judgment has yet to be made public. However, thesubstance of what Blanchard J had to say in Matenga appears in the judgment ofLord Scott ......