R v McCarthy

JurisdictionNew Zealand
Year1992
Date1992
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 cases
  • R v Morhall
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 20 Julio 1995
    ...codes applicable in some other common law jurisdictions (as in New Zealand, as to which see Reg. v. McGregor [1962] N Z.L.R. 1069 and Reg. v. McCarthy [1992] 2 N.Z.L.R. 550, and in Tasmania, as to which see Stingel v. The Queen (1990) 171 C.L.R. 312). Indeed, by exploiting the adjective "re......
  • Luc v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 26 Marzo 1996
    ...state or personality might as such be taken into account by the jury for the purposes of the objective test. However, R v McCarthy ([1992] 2 NZLR 550) had explained that mental characteristics of the defendant could be taken into account in New Zealand because of the deliberate intention of......
  • R v Smith (Morgan James)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 27 Julio 2000
    ...of the accused and it was that aspect of the observations of North J. which came to be further considered in Reg. v. McCarthy [1992] 2 N.Z.L.R. 550. The passage in North J's judgment in McGregor which was quoted by Cooke J. in McCarthyonly begins with what I have referred to as the further ......
  • R v Smith (Morgan James)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 29 Julio 1998
    ...the following authorities: 34 R v Newell (1980) 71 Cr App R 331 (Court of Appeal). 35 R v McGregor (1962) NZLR 1069 . 36 R v McCarthy (1992) 2 NZLR 550 . 37 R v Raven (1982) Crim LR 51 (a decision of the Recorder of London). 38 R v Ahluwalia 96 Cr App R 133 (Court of Appeal). 39 R v Dr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Recognising Acute Intoxication as Diminished Responsibility? A Comparative Analysis
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 76-1, February 2012
    • 1 Febrero 2012
    ...(Sentencing Act 2002, s. 9(3)).106 Sentencing Act 2002, s. 102.107 See, Brookbanks, above n. 23. See also R v McCarthy [1992] 2 NZLR 550, (1992)8 CRNZ 58, CA; R v Ashton [1989] 2 NZLR 166, (1989) 4 CRNZ 241, CA.108 New Zealand Law Reform Committee, Report on Culpable Homicide (1976) 3.109 N......
  • Innocent Victims and Vulnerable Offenders: Defending Impaired Adults Who Kill Children
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 83-5, October 2019
    • 1 Octubre 2019
    ...test that it imposed. See the line of cases beginning with R v McGregor [1962]NZLR 1069 (CA) and including R v McCarthy [1992] 2 NZLR 550, (1992) 8 CRNZ 58 (CA), R v Campbell [1997] 1 NZLR16, (1996) 14 CRNZ 117 (CA), R v Rongonui [2000] 2 NZLR 385 (CA) and R v Makoare [2001] 1 NZLR 318, (20......
  • Alcoholism and Criminal Liability
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 64-5, September 2001
    • 1 Septiembre 2001
    ...1957 (UK).82 Stingel (1990) 171 CLR 312, at 326; RvMasciantonio (1995) 183 CLR 58.83 [2000] 2 NZLR 38584 See also: RvMcCarthy [1992] 2 NZLR 550; RvCampbell [1997] 1 NZLR 16. Departing from: RvMacGregor [1962] NZLR 1069.September 2001] Alcoholism and Criminal LiabilityßThe Modern Law Review ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT