R v McGregor
Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
Date | 1962 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
32 cases
- Griffiths v Boral Resources (Qld) Pty Ltd
-
R v Ahluwalia
...had tended to focus on physical characteristics. However, the endorsement in Rv NewellUNK ((1980) 71 Cr App R 331) of R v McGregor ([1962] NZLR 1069) showed that characteristics relating to the mental state or personality of an individual, providing they had the necessary degree of permanen......
-
R v Morhall
...to be drawn? Clearly all characteristics do not qualify for attribution to the hypothetical reasonable man. Some guidance is to be found in McGregor 1962 NZLR 1069, in which North J sought to explain the word 'characteristics' used in a similar context in the New Zealand Crimes Act 1981. H......
- R v Dryden
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Recognising Acute Intoxication as Diminished Responsibility? A Comparative Analysis
...thatthe provocation defence was necessary to allow the jury to distinguish102 Brookbanks, above n. 23. See, generally, R vMcGregor [1962] NZLR 1069 at 1081;R v Gordon (1993) 10 CRNZ 430, CA.103 Sentencing Act 2002, s. 102. See generally, New Zealand Law Commission, SomeCriminal Defences wit......
-
Alcoholism and Criminal Liability
...183 CLR 58.83 [2000] 2 NZLR 38584 See also: RvMcCarthy [1992] 2 NZLR 550; RvCampbell [1997] 1 NZLR 16. Departing from: RvMacGregor [1962] NZLR 1069.September 2001] Alcoholism and Criminal LiabilityßThe Modern Law Review Limited 2001 alcoholic before their alcoholism will have any effect on ......