R v Qf, Fc and Jfl

Judgment Date22 November 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] NZHC 3058
CourtHigh Court
Date22 November 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Auckland Council v Cable Bay Wine Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 3 December 2021
    ...at all but incorrectly conflated the burden of proof with interpretation on a legal issue. This was an error of law. 40 41 42 43 R v QF [2019] NZHC 3058. At Powell v Dunedin City Council [2004] 3 NZLR 721 (CA). Beach Road Preservation Society Inc v Whangarei District Council [2001] NZRMA 17......
  • R v Jiaxin Finance Limited & ORS
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 3 March 2020
    ...(iii) Charge 4: On one representative charge under s 92 AML/CFT Act of failing to report a suspicious transaction. 1 R v QF, FC and JFL [2019] NZHC 3058. (c) In respect of Mr Qiang (Michael) Charge 2: On one representative charge under s 91 AML/CFT Act of failing to conduct customer due dil......
  • Jiaxin Finance Limited (in Liquidation) v R
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • 4 November 2022
    ...the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 (the Act).1 Their appeal against conviction and an 1 R v QF [2019] NZHC 3058 (Walker J) [HC judgment]. They were subsequently sentenced in R v Jiaxin Finance Ltd [2022] NZHC 366, [2020] NZCCLR JIAXIN FINANCE LIMITED (I......