R v Rongonui
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Year | 2000 |
| Date | 2000 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 cases
-
Holley v AG
...in this regard have been exaggerated". I am rather in wholehearted agreement with the remark of Thomas J in the New Zealand case of R v Rongonui [2000] 2 NZLR 385, 446 that most trial judges had seen "the glazed look in the jurors' eyes as, immediately after instructing them that it is ope......
-
Mahomed v R Sc
...now provides: 40 Propensity rule (1) 27 28 29 30 31 32 In this section and sections 41 to 43, propensity evidence— As in R v Rongonui [2000] 2 NZLR 385 T (CA 175/97) v Attorney-General CA175/97, 27 August 1997. See for instance R v Meynell [2004] 1 NZLR 507 (CA) at [23]. R v Karetai (1988) ......
-
Mahomed v R
...Evidence and Opinion Evidence (NZLC PP18, 1991) at [61]-[66]; R v Gwaze [2010] NZSC 52, (2010) 24 CRNZ 702 at [47]. 8R v Rongonui [2000] 2 NZLR 385 (CA), R v Rapira [2003] 3 NZLR 794 (CA), and R v Zhou [2007] NZCA 104. 9R v Frost [2008] NZCA 406. 10R v Martin CA199/04, 14 February 2005. 11 ......
-
Hksar v Liang Yaoqiang
...in the application of the objective test, the effect of like provocation on “the ordinary person”. [29] 44. Similarly, in R v Rongonui [2000] 2 NZLR 385, in his observations as to the appropriate directions to a jury in a case of provocation, Tipping J described the appropriate manner in wh......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Criminal Law
...by our Court of Appeal has also been made by the highest courts in Australia (Stingel v R(1990) 171 CLR 312); New Zealand (R v Rongonui[2000] 2 NZLR 385) and Canada (R v Hill[1986] 1 SCR 313). However, the House of Lords in England has recently taken a completely opposite stance in R v Smit......
-
Innocent Victims and Vulnerable Offenders: Defending Impaired Adults Who Kill Children
...including R v McCarthy [1992] 2 NZLR 550, (1992) 8 CRNZ 58 (CA), R v Campbell [1997] 1 NZLR16, (1996) 14 CRNZ 117 (CA), R v Rongonui [2000] 2 NZLR 385 (CA) and R v Makoare [2001] 1 NZLR 318, (2000) 18CRNZ 511 (CA). It is unlikely at this stage that the legislature would be willing to re-ena......