R v Shaheed
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Date | 2002 |
| Year | 2002 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Hamed v R
... ... 173 Prior to the decision in R v Shaheed 205 (and now the enactment of s 30 of the Evidence Act) , when the prima facie exclusion rule prevailed, the courts were inclined to be generous (and some would say over-generous) in making findings that particular searches were not unreasonable. That attitude can be attributed to the almost ... ...
-
C v Holland
... ... The highest expectation of privacy relates to searches of the person and particularly intimate searches, such as strip-searches (as in Pratt ), or invasive procedures, such as DNA testing (as in Shaheed ). In terms of searches of property, residential property will have the highest expectation of privacy attached to it (see, for example, R v McManamy (2002) 19 CRNZ 669 (CA) ). There will be some gradation even within a residential property, however. The public areas will invoke a lesser ... ...
- Taunoa v Attorney General
- Wilson v R