Your World of Legal Intelligence
 New Zealand | 1-800-335-6202

Re Brumark Investments Ltd, Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Agnew

Cited authorities 4 Cited in 2 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionNew Zealand
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date2000
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Richard Dale Agnew and Another v The Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 5 June 2001
    ....... . 2 The company which granted the charge in question, Brumark Investments Limited, is in receivership. The only assets available for distribution to creditors ... of the controversial decision of the English Court of Appeal in In re New Bullas Trading Ltd [1994] 1 BCLC 449 and may have been deliberately drafted in order to take advantage of that ......
  • National Westminster Bank Plc v Spectrum Plus Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 30 June 2005
    ...charge have been clearly explained in a lengthy passage in the opinion of the Privy Council, delivered by Lord Millett, in Agnew v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2001] 2 AC 710, 717-721, paras 5-15. This passage shows how the development of the floating charge was enthusiastically encoura......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT