Re Mulligan (Deceased)

JurisdictionNew Zealand
Date1998
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
25 cases
  • Daniel v Tee
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 1 July 2016
    ...been likely to achieve, based on the average performance of ordinary shares. Such loss was proved in a New Zealand case (Re Mulligan [1998] 1 NZLR 481)." The text of that paragraph goes on to explain that the basis of that decision was that by early 1972 the trustees had a duty to diversify......
  • Commonwealth of Australia v Davis Samuel Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 21 November 2014
    ...(1998) 45 NSWLR 262 Parsons v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 619 Potts v Miller (1940) 64 CLR 282 Re Dawson (deceased) [1966] 2 NSWR 211 Re Mulligan (deceased) [1998] 1 NZLR 481 Re Tennant; Mortlock v Hawker (1942) 65 CLR 473 Saunders v Vautier (1841) 4 Beav 115 Secure Parking (WA) Pty Ltd v Wi......
  • Lee v Torrey
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 4 September 2015
    ...727 at 739. 6 Re Whiteley, Whiteley v Learoyd (1886) 33 Ch D 347 at 355. 7 Karger v Paul [1984] VR 161 at 164. 8 At 164. 9 Re Mulligan [1998] 1 NZLR 481 (HC) at 501 per Panckhurst J. 10 Dundee General Hospitals Board of Management v Walker [1952] 1 All ER 896 (HL). 11 At 901. 12 At 901. 13......
  • Selkirk v McIntyre
    • New Zealand
    • High Court
    • 25 March 2013
    ...Parlington, 57 T.L.R. 654 (Ch 1888); Wynne v Tempest [1897] 1 Ch 110; Goodwin v Duggan & Ors (1996) 41 NSWLR 158 at 166; Re Mulligan [1998] 1 NZLR 481 at 502 and 511 per Pankhurst 9 Baynard v Woolley (1855) 20 Beav 583; 52 ER 729; Re Smith [1896] 1 Ch 71; Andrew Butler (ed) Equity and Tru......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Remoteness Criteria in Equity
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 65-4, July 2002
    • 1 July 2002
    ...to Dr James Edelman for his comments on an earlier version of this note.1Swindle vHarrison [1997] 4 All ER 705 (CA) 733; Re Mulligan [1998] 1 NZLR 481, 509;O’Halloran vRT Thomas & Family Pty Ltd (1998) 45 NSWLR 262 (CA) 273–278; Maguire vMakaronis (1997) 188 CLR 449, 470; Permanent Building......
  • RECONCEPTUALISING FIDUCIARY REGULATION IN ACTUAL CONFLICTS.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 45 No. 1, August 2021
    • 1 August 2021
    ...allows the trustee to act for both income and capital beneficiaries whose interests clearly diverge: see, eg, Re Mulligan (Deceased) [1998] 1 NZLR 481 (High Court of New Zealand). Section 29 of the Trustee Act 2000 (UK) also authorises the trustee to receive (226) See especially Keech (n 9)......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT