Ross v R
| Judgment Date | 12 December 2017 |
| Neutral Citation | [2017] NZCA 587 |
| Date | 12 December 2017 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Smith v R
...in the warning given have not occasioned a miscarriage. The most recent ones are A (CA244/2017) v R [2018] NZCA 225; Ross v R [2017] NZCA 587; leave declined in [2018] NZSC 38; and C (CA66/2015) v R [2016] NZCA 342. Our point is they are decisions on their facts and do not represent any sor......
-
S (CA377/2017) v R
...to a person in Mr S’s position is that some category of offence or of trial is 63 64 Summary Proceedings Act, s 66(7). Ross v R [2017] NZCA 587 at in some way, inherently and objectively, more likely to receive a fair trial before a judge than it is before a jury. Hence, where the error is ......
-
John William Ross v R
...because their evidence would not have unequivocally supported Mr Ross’ denial that the children stayed with him.7 2 3 4 5 6 7 Ross v R [2017] NZCA 587 (Winkelmann, Wylie and Whata Evidence Act 2006, s 122. Ross v R, above n 2, at [57]. At [58]–[60]. At [61]–[63]. See at [63]. Our assessment......
-
Swain v R
...issue appropriately by facing up to it and seeking to explain Mr Swain’s position in a way the jury would understand. 10 11 Ross v R [2017] NZCA 587 at E (CA113/2009) (No 2) v R [2010] NZCA 280 at [27]. Cross-examination of Ms McKay and Mr and Mrs B [35] Ms McKay was Mr Swain’s former partn......
Request a trial to view additional results