Sililoto & ORS v R
| Judgment Date | 14 July 2016 |
| Neutral Citation | [2016] NZCA 328 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 14 July 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Thomas v R
...Court has previously held, uplifts that exceed the original sentences are unlikely to be considered proportionate.13 12 13 Sililoto v R [2016] NZCA 328 at [35] and [37], citing Oliver v R [2014] NZCA 285 at [9]; Te v R [2008] NZCA 47 at [26]; and R v Paul CA409/05, 25 April 2006. Orchard v ......
-
Cossey v R
...at [46]–[47]. Compare R v Cossey, above n 1, at [28]. R v Cossey, above n 1, at [32]. Thomas v R [2020] NZCA 257 at [16]; Sililoto v R [2016] NZCA 328 at [35] and [37]; Oliver v R [2014] NZCA 285 at [9]; Te Aho v R [2008] NZCA 47 at [26]; and R v Paul CA409/05, 25 April to apply that figure......
-
Corless v R
...manifestly excessive. Jarden v R [2008] NZSC 69, [2008] 3 NZLR 612 at [14]. At [12]. Thomas v R [2020] NZCA 257 at [16]. Silitoto v R [2016] NZCA 328 at The appeal is dismissed. —Jagose J ...
-
R v Hannon
...v R [2016] NZCA 221; R v Korach [2016] NZHC 923;R v Sarsfield [2015] NZHC 1977; R v Davoren [2015] NZHC 807, upheld by Sililoto v R [2016] NZCA 328. one address and another two from a separate address. Each of the weapons must be considered in the sentencing analysis. [11] The firearms foun......
Request a trial to view additional results