Simpson v Attorney General (Baigent's Case)
| Jurisdiction | New Zealand |
| Date | 1994 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
119 cases
-
Fose v Minister of Safety and Security
...v Kodellas (1989) 60 DLR ( 4th) A 143 (Sask CA) Silver v United Kingdom (1984) 6 EHRR 62 Simpson v Attorney-General (Baigent's case) [1994) 3 NZLR 667 (CA) Smith v Wade 461 US 30 (1983) South African Associated Newspapers Ltd and Another v Yutar 1969 (2) SA ~2W B The State (At the Prosecuti......
-
Attorney-General v Arthur William Taylor
...Bill of Rights for New Zealand: A White Paper” [1984–1985] I AJHR A6 [the White Paper] at [3.8]–[3.12]. 28 Simpson v Attorney-General [1994] 3 NZLR 667 (CA) [ Baigent] at 676. See also Attorney-General v Chapman [2011] NZSC 110, [2012] 1 NZLR 462 at [1]–[2] per Elias CJ and [203] per McGra......
-
North Shore City Council v Body Corporate
...AC 923 (HL) at 958. 74 Markesinis et al at 79. 75 At 112 – 113. 76 At 113. 77 At 113. 78 Simpson v Attorney-General (Baigent's Case) [1994] 3 NZLR 667 79 Corbett v Social Security Commission [1962] NZLR 878 (CA). 80 Jim Evans in “Precedent in New Zealand's Permanent Court of Appeal” in Rick......
-
Taylor v Attorney-General of New Zealand
...Attorney-General” [1998] New Zealand Law Review 683 at 693, set out at para [47] above. 73 Simpson v Attorney-General [Baigent's Case] [1994] 3 NZLR 667 74 New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 21. 75 Simpson v Attorney-General [Baigent's Case] [1994] 3 NZLR 667 (CA) at 676. 76 Ibid, at 69......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
A declaration of rights (or legislative wrongs) in New Zealand
...[2015] NZHC 1706, [2015] 3 NZLR 791 at [61]. 3 Taylor v Attorney-General [2018] NZSC 104 at [39], citing Simpson v Attorney-General [1994] 3 NZLR 667 (CA) (Baigent's Case) per Cooke P at 4 At [56]. 5 At [102]. 6 At [134]. 7 The minority (at [143]) used the example of New Health New Zealand ......
18 books & journal articles
-
A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The UK or Canada as a Model?
...of Appeal to imply certain fairly maximalist remedies, including a right to damages for the breach of the Act: see, eg, Simpson v A-G [1994] 3 NZLR 667 ('Baigent's Case'). For some, this raises concerns about the stability of weak-form judicial review: see, eg, James Allan, 'Take Heed Austr......
-
Constitutional Limits on Bills of Rights Introduced by a State or Territory
...Huscroft, Scott Optican and Richard Mahoney (eds), The New Zealand Bill of Rights (2003) 811, 819. 44 Simpson v A-G (Baigent's Case) [1994] 3 NZLR 667, 698–9 (Hardie Boys J), see also at 676 (Cooke P). 45 See, eg, Simpson v A-G (Baigent's Case) [1994] 3 NZLR 667; Lange v Atkinson and ACP NZ......
-
Alexander Meiklejohn, American Constitutional Law, and Australia's Implied Freedom of Political Communication
...(2003) 217 CLR 30, 52–3 (McHugh, Gummow and Hayne JJ); Kruger (1997) 190 CLR 1, 124–6 (Gaudron J). 104 Simpson v Attorney-General [1994] 3 NZLR 667 ('Baigent's Case'). 105 Ibid 692, 702, 705. 2006 American Constitutional Law and the Implied Freedom of Political Communication 439 ___________......
-
Human Rights Protection in Australia: Interpretation Provisions and Parliamentary Supremacy
...ss 4 and 6, see R v Pora [2001] 2 NZLR 37; Moonen v Film and Literature Board of Review [2000] 2 NZLR 9; Simpson v Attorney-General [1994] 3 NZLR 667 ('Baigent's Case'). See generally Grant Huscroft and Paul Rishworth (eds), Rights and Freedoms: The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and t......
Request a trial to view additional results